1990: 6--7). The two-gender exclusiveness of the shower website betrays the high

Possible of the website as a sexual site, the gaze at nakedness as a sexual act and the
Implied eroticism that is encoded in this kind of website. The relative adjustment of the
system where the trajectory of sexual or enticing desire is allowed to extend
to either gender (as long as it is an ostensible, coherent sex) destabilizes the
non-sexuality of the site. Where the sex exclusiveness CAn't be under-
stood to guard against the presence of want as homoerotic want, and where the
potential fall of homosociality with homosexuality is increasingly charged,
the website becomes unstable, and nakedness and gazing upon it can no longer be
understood as alone nonsexual forms of pleasurable action.
However, the uncertainty between the frame of the communal showers and
that of the sexual is normally understood by participants. Special rituals are
in place to cease the homosociality of communal nakedness sliding into homo-
http://x-topless.com/pins/how-did-i-come-to-be-a-nudist/ . As Janene Hancock lately points out, these rituals are practised in
the kinds of 'appropriate' dialog:
to girls, the semantics used are not always complimentary. They discuss problems for example their

sexual conquests, their prowess at picking-up, taking out and 'screwing' the women they meet,
Also as fairly often-lurid details concerning their sexual exploits. . . .
tion is about making guys feel positive about themselves, solidifying their maleness and
rejecting any understanding that they may belong to the marginalised masculinity of gays or
poofters. It is a kind of bonding between men, reinforcing their relationship with each other
-- verbally more than physically.
Among guys, statements of homophobia, dialogs about girls and the
ways in which the gaze is performed as a non-lusty looking shield the
communal nakedness of men from signifying nakedness-as-sexual. Furthermore,
among women there are specific codes of behavior that cease the nakedness in
communal showers from slipping into the sexual. I'm reliably advised that
fkk videos in this type of site will often either have a dialog that prevents drawing
Focus to the common nudity as accessible to the gaze of others or, if more
comfortable, stay totally silent. These too are unique ritualistic codes
which prevent the nakedness/gaze duality from being understood as having a
sexual component, regardless of the ways in which such nakedness/gazing might
be involved in acts of policing the physical.
So what, recently, has been occurring to the site of the communal shower as
codes of gazing? According to a 1996 New York Times article, showering after
Physical education course by secondary school males isn't only on the decline but has now
Although the writer speculates that
this decline intersects with issues of modesty and expectations of body image and
tness, he also points to an erotic element:
... some health and physical education experts state that many pupils withdraw [from
post-exercise showering] precisely on account of the overload of sexual images -- so many perfectly
toned bodies cannot help but leave normal people feeling a bit insufficient. (Johnson, 1996)
The proliferation of a sexualized male physique reliant on the show of esh in
Advertisements, combined with the failure of 'compulsory heterosexuality' and the
heterosexual matrix increases the fear that communal nakedness among boys will
be gazed upon in erotic or sexualized ways that have previously been shielded
by the gender segregation of communal showers on the presumption that all
participants in the showers are heterosexual and can thereby merely perform a
sexual gazing at another gender. This 'cultural issue' is augmented further as
the stereotype of gay men as non-sport is increasingly discredited.
trates this recent cultural concern over shower-space nudity increasingly coupled
with sexual or sensual types of gazing. While depictions of naked women in lm
have been common and cannot easily be separated from a want for erotic gazing
The Nude Subject

by a phallocentric lm sector, the portrayal of naked males in lm is by no
means recent. As early as the 1925 production of Ben-Hur, male frontal nudity
was shown on screen and, despite the ban on nudity through the intervention of
1968 (Russo, 1981: 121--2), a spate of popular lms from the 1970s onwards
depicted man nudity --

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *